Executive Summary

​

This report contains four analyses that investigate potential value engineering options for Corporate Campus Building 7, as well as research into a relevant construction industry topic. They are as follows:

​

Analysis I: Unitized Metal Panels

​

Fabrication tolerances for the facade precast concrete panels were particularly stringent. As a result, the project team reported difficulties with aligning the panels with other facade and interior elements. This analysis explores the feasibility of replacing the precast panels and ribbon windows with a unitized metal panel and curtain wall system. The investigation utilizes a cost and schedule analysis of both systems on a square foot basis. The thermal performance of both wall assembles are also modeled and calculated to determine any impacts on the enclosure thermal envelope from changing materials.

​

Analysis II: Footings SIP Schedule

​

Design changes were being implemented on the campus project during the foundations phase, leading excavation to outpace concrete placement. The area experienced a torrential rainstorm that incurred additional costs from dewatering and re-grading the excavated footings. This analysis investigates the implementation of a short interval production schedule (SIPS) for the footings to limit the weather damage. It is explored from several angles including cost, schedule, and manpower.

​

Analysis III: Corridor LED Downlights

​

One of the most unique interior lighting configurations also proved to be one of the most difficult to install. The F22 LED fixtures span nearly 7500 linear feet throughout the building to create a sleek, modern aesthetic. This analysis explores replacing the F22's with 6" square LED downlights to improve constructability, reduce cost, and shorten installation. A typical corridor space is also modeled to examine the visual impacts of both fixtures, as well as their illuminances throughout the space. 

​

Research Topic: Value of Field Experience in Construction Management Recruitment

​

Engineering students with field experience could potentially draw the interest of career fair recruiters. Many younger student put pressure on themselves to acquire an internship that they ignore the possibility of working in the field for the summer. This research dives into how companies, particularly those that recruit at Penn State, value field experience in comparison to your "typical" high school or early college summer jobs. The hope is that more students will be inspired to pursue opportunities to work in the field (even just for one summer), and experience the industry from a tradesmen's perspective. 

​

​

​

​

​

​